Prevalence of Refractive Errors; the Yazd Eye Study

PURPOSE To determine the prevalence of refractive errors in Yazd, central Iran. METHODS This population-based study was performed in 2010-2011 and targeted adults aged 40 to 80 years. Multi-stage random cluster sampling was applied to select samples from urban and rural residents of Yazd. Manifest refraction, visual acuity measurement, retinoscopy and funduscopy were performed for all subjects. Myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia were defined as spherical equivalent (SE) <-0.50 diopters (D), SE >+0.50 D, cylindrical error >0.5 D and SE difference ≥1 D between fellow eyes, respectively. RESULTS From a total of 2,320 selected individuals, 2,098 subjects (90.4%) participated out of which 198 subjects were excluded due to previous eye surgery. The prevalence (95% confidence interval) for myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, anisometropia, -6 D myopia or worse, and 4 D hyperopia or worse was 36.5% (33.6-39.4%), 20.6% (17.9-23.3%), 53.8% (51.3-56.3%), 11.9% (10.4-13.4%), 2.3% (1.6-2.9%) and 1.2% (0.6-1.8%), respectively. The prevalence of hyperopia, astigmatism and anisometropia increased with age. The prevalence of myopia was significantly higher in female subjects. The prevalence of with-the-rule, against-the-rule and oblique astigmatism was 35.7%, 13.4% and 4.6%, respectively. The prevalence of against-the-rule astigmatism increased with age (P<0.001); with-the-rule astigmatism was more common in women (P=0.038). CONCLUSION More than half of the study population had refractive errors; the prevalence of myopia and astigmatism was higher than earlier studies in Iran. Since refractive errors are a major cause of avoidable visual impairment, their high prevalence in this survey is important from a public health perspective.